Which statement best describes the fate of the League of Nations in 1946?

Which statement best describes the fate of the League of Nations in 1946?

• A. It was expanded to include more nations
• B. It became the primary organ of the United Nations
• C. It merged with NATO
• D. It was dissolved

Answer: (D)

The key idea is what happened to the League of Nations after World War II. By 1946 the League’s authority had collapsed as it failed to prevent aggression and provide effective security, and a new international order was forming around the United Nations. In 1946 the League was formally dissolved, with its remaining assets and functions transferred to the UN and its Covenant terminated. This marks the end of the League as an active organization and the beginning of the UN’s role in global diplomacy and security. It wasn’t expanded or absorbed into NATO, and the UN became the successor body, not the League.

The key idea is what happened to the League of Nations after World War II. By 1946 the League’s authority had collapsed as it failed to prevent aggression and provide effective security, and a new international order was forming around the United Nations. In 1946 the League was formally dissolved, with its remaining assets and functions transferred to the UN and its Covenant terminated. This marks the end of the League as an active organization and the beginning of the UN’s role in global diplomacy and security. It wasn’t expanded or absorbed into NATO, and the UN became the successor body, not the League.